Home » ... » Evidence for an Issue
Evidence for an Issue 2 pieces of evidence for this issue.
| failure modes may be unanticipated by designers - Some possible failures may not be anticipated by designers so there are no contingency procedures provided to pilots, possibly increasing trouble-shooting workload and the opportunity for error.
|
-
|
Evidence Type: |
Excerpt from Survey |
|
Evidence: |
23 of the 30 (77%) respondents reported a 4 (= agree) or 5 (= strongly agree) with pc24 failure modes may be unanticipated by designers
|
|
Strength: |
+4 |
|
Aircraft: |
unspecified |
|
Equipment: |
automation |
|
Source: |
Lyall, E., Niemczyk, M. & Lyall, R. (1996). Evidence for flightdeck automation problems: A survey of experts.
See Resource details
|
-
|
Evidence Type: |
Excerpt from Survey |
|
Evidence: |
2 of the 30 (7%) respondents reported a 1 (=strongly disagree) or a 2 (=disagree) with pc24 failure modes may be unanticipated by designers
|
|
Strength: |
-1 |
|
Aircraft: |
unspecified |
|
Equipment: |
automation |
|
Source: |
Lyall, E., Niemczyk, M. & Lyall, R. (1996). Evidence for flightdeck automation problems: A survey of experts.
See Resource details
|
|