FDAI logo   ::  Site Map  ::   
Home  |  About This Website  |  Contact Us
Home » ... » Evidence for an Issue

Evidence for an Issue 2 pieces of evidence for this issue.

failure modes may be unanticipated by designers (Issue #24) - Some possible failures may not be anticipated by designers so there are no contingency procedures provided to pilots, possibly increasing trouble-shooting workload and the opportunity for error.

  1.  
  2. Evidence Type: Excerpt from Survey
    Evidence: 23 of the 30 (77%) respondents reported a 4 (= agree) or 5 (= strongly agree) with pc24 failure modes may be unanticipated by designers
    Strength: +4
    Aircraft: unspecified
    Equipment: automation
    Source: Lyall, E., Niemczyk, M. & Lyall, R. (1996). Evidence for flightdeck automation problems: A survey of experts. See Resource details

  3.  
  4. Evidence Type: Excerpt from Survey
    Evidence: 2 of the 30 (7%) respondents reported a 1 (=strongly disagree) or a 2 (=disagree) with pc24 failure modes may be unanticipated by designers
    Strength: -1
    Aircraft: unspecified
    Equipment: automation
    Source: Lyall, E., Niemczyk, M. & Lyall, R. (1996). Evidence for flightdeck automation problems: A survey of experts. See Resource details
Flight Deck Automation Issues Website  
© 1997-2013 Research Integrations, Inc.